The title should probably be more like ‘fluff journalism can go suck it’ but I’m feeling confrontational.
Seriously though, what type of service do you provide to your community when you focus on the superficial and ignore all of the other possibilities?
Sparking this diatribe off was the recent reading and book signing by Heather Armstrong, creator of the Dooce web site and content. I got there, enjoyed the reading, stood in line to get my book signed. Nothing really out of the ordinary.
That is until a FOX 13 crew showed up to interview people in line (and probably the book author, but hey, you never know). As I watched from my slightly elevated vantage point, the crew stopped and talked to a guy in line. Then, another guy in line. Okay, a bit unusual since the line was 70% women, but random chance is always a possibility.
Dude with a mic and his camera man (I’m not going to call him a journalist) makes his way up to where I am and goes past (whew!) to the signing table and, pulls yet another dude out of line, this one just having had his book signed. At this point, I’m close enough to hear the questions which are along the lines of “As a guy, why are you having your book signed” and “Why does a woman’s author appeal to you”?
Huh?
You have an intelligent, funny, irreverent, witty author; her life experiences with depression, being fired for posting gossip online, raising a family, etc., appeal to a broad spectrum of readers and all you can focus on is your incredulity that a guy might enjoy her writing? How insulting! I seriously believe that if the author was male and had wrote the same type of content that gender wouldn’t have ever come up.
Thanks again TV journalism for giving me reason why you aren’t worth the electrons wasted on you. Fortunately, there are other functional journalists out there that do a worthwhile job.